Administrate users, not content In content disputes, an administrator's voice should be viewed like that of any other user.
#UNTITLED GOOSE GAME PROFILE PICTURE FREE#
If an edit is obviously abusive, feel free to take appropriate action, but where's there is doubt, give the editor the benefit of that doubt. The following principles are thought to be "best practices" for administrators:Īssume good faith When there's doubt about whether an edit was intended to help the wiki, assume it was and treat the editor that way. That includes keeping discussions civil, helping make the articles as complete, accurate, and easy to use as possible, and other things.
Your administrator role makes others expect you to take responsibility for your community. Making a decision unilaterally and imposing it upon others is ill-advised. While this doesn't mean decisions are based on vote counts, this does mean that you should discuss a problem and try to find an optimal solution. On public and open wikis, consensus is preferred to hierarchy. In this guide, wiki guardians, administrators, and bureaucrats are all called just "administrators".
On wikis using the standard role, some administrators may also have the bureaucrat role that lets them promote and demote administrators. On most Gamepedia wikis, users with access to moderation tools have the wiki guardian role, while on some wikis, the standard MediaWiki administrator role is used instead. 8.1 Cultural reverence of administrators.3.1 Where to request features and ask questions.
0 kommentar(er)
